|
slickwilly787 (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
Yeah, she is good looking as she already is. And like the photographer said its not even feasible to try and maintain a body like that. Plus, every girl that even comes close to looking like model quality like that has always been trouble and waay too stuck on themselves
Mattthecricketbat1 (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
the problem isn't the re-touchingthe problem is people's minds thinking that their identity is wrapped up in their physical appearance rather than in who they are in Christ - beautiful people who are dearly loved and perfect through Him who loved us.
weemans11 (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
I agree.
sined911 (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
No, I don't think it should be banned.I honestly believe that these beautiful women in editorial and commercial photo shoots are used as nothing more than for modeling. Modeling to me means art. I mean, I'm sure Michelangelo embellished a bit too :D
iCantSay (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
no should not be banned
inofaith (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
during the shoot she already looks lovely.Does anybody agree (just to see if your image of how a girl should look is normal)
dsubversion (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
I loved to see more natural images. No one is perfect, we just love to trick ourselves with the fantasy of perfection. More people need to understand our imperfections and embrace them.
thefrankie5 (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
Check out my Profile to get loads and loads of Photoshop tutorials, with things like how to change day into night and how to change body parts !!!Check it out and become a photoshop Genius !!
DreamMover (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
this is a great video....Ima Digital editor myself... and this is really koool how they get this out there so people can reall under stand the truth about photos.
alvesky (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
AGREE |
